The starting point
155 thermal scopes.
Confusing specs.

Different specifications, missing detailsand changing prices leave you to work outwhich differences matter for your huntingand what is worth paying more for.
Methodology · Thermal scopes
HuntGrade brings together published specifications, our own research and calculated comparisons to help you choose a thermal scope. Here’s how we decide what matters and turn those differences into scores.
Our approach
We turn deep industry research, scope specifications and retailer pricing into clear visual comparisons, so you can understand the tradeoffs, see what your money buys and choose a scope that fits your hunting.
The starting point

Different specifications, missing detailsand changing prices leave you to work outwhich differences matter for your huntingand what is worth paying more for.
What HuntGrade adds

We make specs comparable and score everyscope by the same rules. Modeled thermalviews show the differences, while retailerprices help put their cost in context.
Clear choices
Compare scopes, see the tradeoffs andunderstand what your money buys. Findthe right balance of performance andprice for the way you hunt.
Understand the weights
Image performance carries the most weight, followed by handling and warranty. We break each category into the factors below, so you can see how a scope’s strengths and tradeoffs contribute to its HuntGrade score.
80% of the total score
Within Image
15% of the total score
Within Handling
5% of the total score
Within Warranty
See it add up
A scope’s total reflects both the points it earns and the weight each factor carries. Choose a scope to see the breakdown, then select any factor to explore its calculation.

1280×1024 sensor · 60 mm lens · 12 µm
Follow the calculation
See how each specification earns points and where further improvements earn less credit. Choose a factor to explore the scoring rule and your scope’s result.
More sensor pixels preserve detail across the scene, earning the largest share of Image. A 256×192 sensor earns 10 points; 1280×1024 earns 100. Each doubling of total pixels adds the same credit because the benefit covers the whole view. Digital zoom enlarges existing pixels without adding detail.
Sources & methods
We research the gaps and put every scope on the same basis, so you can compare them.
| Published specs | After HuntGrade | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope APublished | Scope BPublished | Scope BAfter HuntGrade | ||
| Aperture | f/1.0 | Missing | becomes | f/1.2Estimated |
| Mounted weight | 24 ozWith mount | 22 ozWithout mount | becomes | 27 oz+ 5 oz reference mount |
| Field of view | 7.5° | 13.1 mWide at 100 m | becomes | 7.5°Converted to degrees |
Choose a spec to see how we handle missing details, conflicting claims and different definitions.
We use published system NETD first, published sensor NETD second, then a researched sensor estimate. Sensor figures stand in for system sensitivity in the score. We do not measure NETD; manufacturers’ test conditions may differ.
Unpublished aperture may use a researched estimate, labeled in the specifications. A similar scope alone does not establish the value.
We use the scope’s listed weight and account for its mount. Published weights that exclude the mount need an adjustment, so scopes are compared on a mounted basis.
We check published figures against scope geometry. Calculated corrections retain the original claim and reason. Apparent FOV is an approximation, not an eyepiece measurement, and is excluded from scoring.
We match the exact scope and generation, keeping sensor, display and recording pixels separate. Digital zoom and larger recordings do not add sensor detail.
Published runtime keeps its battery setup and “up to” qualifications. Cold weather and active features can change how long it lasts.
We retain the published rating. “Waterproof” without a test rating does not establish an immersion depth or duration.
We check region, covered components, registration and transferability. Thermal electronics coverage and conditional extensions may differ from the headline term.
Identification range
We use the same target size and detail threshold to calculate ID distance for every scope.
Published ranges often use a human target; we use an adult hog to reflect a hunting scenario.
A human target 1.7 meters tall next to our hog reference, 1.3 meters long from nose to base of tail.
Identifying an animal takes more pixels than simply detecting a heat signature.
Common DRI thresholds
We count 13 pixels along the hog’s 1.30 m body length, not the total pixels inside its outline.
We combine that target and pixel threshold with each scope’s focal length and pixel pitch.
Limitations
Scores, simulations and estimated ID ranges help explain differences between scopes. Field conditions and hands-on experience add context these comparisons can’t capture.