ThOR 5 640 4-32x

Name: ATN ThOR 5 640 4-32x
Brand: ATN

Identifies a hog at 150 yd35° apparent FOV — how big the view looks

The ATN ThOR 5 640 4-32x ranks #70 of 80 640-class scopes on image: a budget play — you give up some image and keep $1,224 (image 65, class median 73; $2,769.99 against $3,994). The same Chinese core sits in the ATN ThOR LTV 640 2-6x at $2,099.99 — the extra $670 here buys the 50mm lens.

Pros

Identifies a hog to ~200 yd
~10 h battery

Cons

40 mK — noisier in low light
Narrow 8.8° field of view
Image 65 — below class median

67.5

#82 of 160

HuntGrade Score

Image

Handling

Warranty

Range fit

How much of the score applies at each distance

$2,649

Best price · 5 retailers

What the price buys

How we compare →

Computed by comparing this scope against its own siblings on the board — same sensor and lens held equal. Refreshed with every catalog update.

+$350 of packaging on the same picture

Same 640×480 sensor and 50 mm lens as the ThOR LTV 640 4-12x at $2,420. The extra buys the body, controls and feature tier — not detail at distance.

Compared with ATN ThOR LTV 640 4-12x ($2,420)

The going rate

Priced $720 under the going rate for its build.

Every dot is the street price of a scope built like this one — same sensor class, a similar lens, no rangefinder.

Score breakdown

How we score →

One blended score, three parts in plain sight — Image carries 75%, Handling 20%, Warranty 5%.

HuntGrade Score

0.75 × 65.3 + 0.20 × 69.9 + 0.05 × 90 — #82 of 160

67.5

Image

640×480 core · ~40 mK (our estimate) · 50mm lens — #70 of 80 in the 640 class

Handling

36.2 oz · 4× base · 4x-32x zoom

Warranty

5 years · first owner only

Price vs. image — the 640 class

Full market view →

Each dot is a 640-class scope: image score up, street price across, dot size = objective lens. The shaded corner is the best-value zone — the most picture for the least money. This scope is outlined in black.

Through this scope, for real

Recorded through the ATN ThOR 5 640 4-32x by reviewers and owners. Video compression softens the picture — the eyepiece shows more detail than the upload. Maker samples are shot in best-case conditions.